Comments on: Ignatieff opposes an elected Senate http://canuckpolitics.com/2010/01/11/ignatieff-senate-reform/ because soundbites aren't enough Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:54:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: papalosopher http://canuckpolitics.com/2010/01/11/ignatieff-senate-reform/#comment-3896 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:40:31 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=1730#comment-3896 In Canada, we don’t decide our vote on the basis of our local candidate; studies show when we vote we consider the leader first and the policies second. So Iggy’s suggestion that the Senate might be for good, ineluctable people is weak. There is no such thing as an ineluctable candidate.

… Patrick Brazeau has a job until he is 75, not 65.

I rather would like to see it abolished myself, but otherwise I agree with Iggy.

]]> By: sweiland75 http://canuckpolitics.com/2010/01/11/ignatieff-senate-reform/#comment-3897 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:00:15 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=1730#comment-3897 @Steeper33 I agree, Steeper33. It seems like most Canadians believe Canada has a two-party system, while there are other third parties that exist. I am an NDP supporter and I will always be an NDP supporter.

]]> By: Steeper33 http://canuckpolitics.com/2010/01/11/ignatieff-senate-reform/#comment-3898 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:43:12 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=1730#comment-3898 Ignatieff…….NWO Scumbag
Harper……..NWO Scumbag

I’m tired of picking the lesser of Scumbags, how about you.

Я Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N

]]>