Comments on: Harper confirms Afghan combat mission to end in 2011 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/ because soundbites aren't enough Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:07:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: NAUresistance http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2863 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:16:35 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2863 “By 2011, when this military mission ends, our Canadian soldiers will have served there a decade on the front lines, much longer than during either of the world wars,”

You got a liitle more than 12 Months Mr. Harper.. hope you are working on your exit plan.. Time is ticking.. We are all watching!

]]> By: garyco99 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2864 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:10:23 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2864 You all watch, we are not leaving Alganistan at all. Something will happen to keep us there, purhaps attaks on Canada will strengthen that rebound. Harper is such a liar, we were suppose to be out 2 years ago as per Harper statements then. It is all politics, watch and learn….

]]> By: tyyleer http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2862 Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:17:37 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2862 we are not there just to keep peace. the infantry men over their have been tasked with search and destroy the enemy

]]> By: tdawg020 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2861 Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:37:46 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2861 Not a fan at harper, were not there for war were there to keep peace. He has to understand you must build a force before you can see one obtain there own ways. I hope those threats he gets dont come true, but harper better not be wrong.

]]> By: HatakeStrife http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2860 Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:40:35 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2860 even if you don’t accept it, Canada has always been a policing Country. what the hell do you think Peace Keepers do?

The “Main force” is out by 2011 so the liberals can shut there traps now.

]]> By: ertboy01 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2859 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:11:23 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2859 i know everyone has their own opinion about this matter. I personally have my aplication in the armed forces right now. I am trying to get over seas as soon as possible

]]> By: 000NoctemAeternus000 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2858 Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:08:47 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2858 okay i dont know what to say to this, personally i wanna go back over but thats just me, i think we should stay and eradicate the insurgency its a good enough reason for me

]]> By: Tian http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2857 Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:47:41 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2857 I have a question, I’m writting this paper on Harpers decision on removing forces in 2011, I was wondersing if his decision will interferre and impact with the current mission. What is the current mission in Afghan anyways.

Thanks alot Politics Fans

Please help me out my email is crainsi@hotmail.com

Scott

]]> By: Thanato26 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2856 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:37:33 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2856 Do you forget thatthe Liberals sent us to Afghanistan back in 2001/2002 for a Combat mission, that we went to the capitol for reconstruction and peace keeping in 2003-2005, then went back down to the south in 2006 to remove the taliban and rebuild the area.

It is hard to rebuild a school when it keeps getting burnt down and the school children killed.

Harper didnt get us into this mess, he just inherited it. Hes giving us the tools to do our jobs.

~Thanato

]]> By: joe31415 http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2855 Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:54:22 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2855 wasted money. conservatives will lose votes because of this

]]> By: TVParkdale http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2853 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:30:55 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2853 You can’t march into someone’s home then point a gun at someone’s head and say, “We are right and you VILL be a democracy! Sieg Heil!” and expect them to see you as ‘liberators’.

]]> By: TVParkdale http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2854 Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:29:23 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2854 jacknapeVO

Amen Canuckybro.

]]> By: jackanapeVO http://canuckpolitics.com/2008/09/10/harper-confirms-afghanistan-pullout-in-2011/#comment-2852 Sat, 27 Sep 2008 05:04:32 +0000 http://canuckpolitics.com/?p=556#comment-2852 If Harper had concentrated on reconstruction from the very beginning, our troops wouldn’t be getting killed. Of course, if we weren’t puppets for the US army, we wouldn’t be there in the first place. Insurgent by definition is a rebel. Harper would promote the idea that if we aren’t there, the taliban will run amuck, when really, our troops are just protecting oil pipelines. Harper cares as little about Afghans as he does Canadians.
Contemptable prick.

]]>